Talk:Beiyue Temple/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Two very short sections needing to be expanded.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   The murals and the stelae are not describe well enough. The mural description is not good and requires expansion. I will leave some tags to this article. I would think most people are unfamiliar with the term "stelae" and would perfer to have this described/linked.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   It would be nice to have a picture of the murals.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Very short and not verydescriptive sections that desperately require expansion. See above.}