Jump to content

Talk:Beit El Kabbalist yeshiva

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Beit El Synagogue)

Rosh Yeshiva Controversy

[edit]

Calling R' Avichai the current Rosh Yeshiva is problematic in that there is no attributable source that names him as such. The Arutz Sheva article sourced in the entry attributes the Rosh Yeshivaship of the Old City Yeshiva to R' Shalom Mordekhai Hedayya. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mekubal (talkcontribs) 18:39, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment does not express that of a non-neutral point of view. This is a gross error of the Arutz Sheva article, as we all know that the Gadol was at the head of Re`hov Rashi Yeshivah. If that article is a good reference, then one should accept the fact (stated in the article) that the Rav Getz headed the Yeshivah in the Old City, which is then in contradiction of your own modifications. As for the fact that the Rav Avi`hai is the current Rosh Yeshivah in the Old City, you can find all kind of sources, ranging from publications to even acknowledgement of that fact in public radio interviews (which is much sufficient for wikipedia), e.g. two recordings in honour of the Hiloulah of the RaShaSh: http://www.iba.org.il/moreshet/moreshet.aspx?classto=InnerKlali&type=1&entity=611770 http://www.iba.org.il/moreshet/moreshet.aspx?classto=InnerKlali&type=1&entity=611771 Note that the Rav Hedaya is interviewed together with the Rav Avi`hai without contradiction expressed whatsoever. This wikipedia article should give expression to both sides (in the Old City and in Re`hov Rashi) without giving more credit to one side or the other, which is the exact purpose of mentioning the dispute in the article, but not in order to pursue any agenda.

hasofer (talk) 07:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beit El Synagogue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]