Talk:Beijing No.4 High School

Schools High‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

First to talk

I heavily modified this article by translating from its specialists-edited Chinese version. Here, I hope more users who are adept at this topic will contribute to further improve the article. Ccyber5 (talk) 13:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

School Name

According to the official letter head, the name of the school should be Beijing High School Four, instead of the colloquial "Beijing No.4 High School" (I have never seen the term "Beijing High School No.4" being used). Should the name of the entry be changed? --Han (talk) 00:14, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

As a part of a project to assess school articles that were unassessed, I have assessed this article for the Schools Project.

I am assessing this article's importance as "Low", but this is a provisional assessment. There are several extraordinary claims made in this article. Without having more in depth knowledge of the history of schools in China, I cannot tell how many of these claims were particularly unique to this school, or happened to many schools in China (especially in regards to post-WWII history). Certainly, being the only school shown off to IOC members shows how high a regard the government holds the school.

Unfortunately, there are no reliable sources cited in the article. This makes it impossible to verify these claims. I strongly hope that editors will seek out reliable, third party sources that can confirm these claims and include them in the article. It is possible that this school is deserving of a much higher importance rating, but I cannot give it without proper referencing.

I am also rating the article a "C" class article. It is impossible for this article to be rated any higher without proper referencing. There was also a problem with some obvious language that did not conform to the neutral point of view policy. I believe I have cleaned most of this up, but I might have missed some.

I wish editors great luck in improving this article. I think this school has an interesting story to tell that will be of interest far beyond China. LonelyBeacon (talk) 16:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upon seeing some of the early referencing, I think I will move from erring on the side of caution to giving the benefit of the doubt. Based on the school's alumni and some history, I believe this article to be a "High" priority of the Schools Project. LonelyBeacon (talk) 04:41, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improving the article

I am copying this from my (LonelyBeacon's) talk page:

Hi, I noticed that you have assessed this article and rated it as Low-importance. Well, I do believe that this school deserves a much higher importance rating. Many people in China (including students from its competitors, e.g., the school that I currently go to) regard Beijing No.4 High School as the best high school in China. And it's the only high school listed on the English version of the Government of Xicheng District, Beijing Website despite the fact that there are many notable high schools in the district.

I have read your suggestions on the talk page and I have added some reliable, third-party references to both the en and zh version of the article.

The problem is, many pre-PRC period facts can't be verified since no third-party source can be found on the Internet (searched in both English and Chinese). So my question is, is using information from the official Beijing No.4 School Alumni Association Website as references acceptable on enwiki? It's not a third-party source, but it's official. On zhwiki, official sources are acceptable (though not recommended). I'm not familiar with enwiki policies and guidelines and I can't find anything mentioning official sources in the corresponding enwiki guideline page Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources.

If official sources are acceptable on enwiki, I'll be able to add more references and maybe I can ask for a re-assess.

--t m yan OMG 02:40, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Tommyang!

I will need some time to check these sources, though I must admit my own shortcomings; I may not be the best person to answer your good question. I have left a request at the Schools Project Talk Page for some more experienced editors to come over and comment or leave suggestions. LonelyBeacon (talk) 00:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am also adding this article to the Wikiproject China article list ... hopefully someone from that project may be able to help as well. LonelyBeacon (talk) 00:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Beijing No. 4 High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

School ground size

There are three figures of the size of school grounds, all different...The only one sourced is from an 1986 paper by the designer... Meng Yibai (talk) 17:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]