Talk:Behavioral sink

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal Behavioral sink is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology High‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Community (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Community, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CommunityWikipedia:WikiProject CommunityTemplate:WikiProject CommunityCommunity

Untitled

This article is awful, for which I apologise -- but I hope that it is better than what was there before. I think the major problem with this article is that the topic of the article necessarily cuts across biology, sociology, psychology, and cultural studies, all at once -- an experimental fact, interpreted in an anthropomorphic way, used as a metaphor for human society, taken up by academia and popular culture, from Scientific American and Mumford to Batman and 2000 AD. Can anyone who knows something about any of these subjects improve this article, please? -- The Anome (talk) 00:31, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seems okay. I might suggest finding another title for the heading "Rat to human comparison". Maybe "Reactions" or "Criticisms"? Kortoso (talk) 21:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that the film The Matrix has an oblique reference to Calhoun's research. Approximate dialog from the movie: "The original matrix was designed to be a paradise, where none suffered...it was a disaster! Whole crops were lost, as people kept trying to wake up. Some said that we lacked the programming language to describe your ideal existence, but I think that human beings define their reality through suffering." It would be interesting if any documented reference to Calhoun could be found in the materials (interviews with screenwriters/producers, etc) connected to that film. Cellodont (talk) 13:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Behavioral sink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130327132421/http://nihrecord.od.nih.gov/newsletters/2008/07_25_2008/story1.htm to http://nihrecord.od.nih.gov/newsletters/2008/07_25_2008/story1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Detail of Universe 25 - why not in this article?

Surely there should be a full dissertation regarding this highly significant experiment, in this article? Boscaswell talk 02:22, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Biblical Reference Legit?

The Book of Revelation discussion does not appear to be in the reference cited, or have any other relevance. Not trying to edit as maybe I am missing something but seems very out of place here. Shoobe01 (talk) 18:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meta-talk experiment applied to the internet.(social media))

Meta-talk a key bit of empirical knowledge you should all use as a basis for other philosophies or insight or understandings so please tell me what you we're thinking as you watch this.

    Things to think about is how this applies to the internet and how basically with the overpopulation of our of our interaction with so many people that limits any real connection. Only in overcrowded masses with manipulated scenarios can we devolve into our worst selves. Metasynapsal (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have a related thought about this. I was reading about Vitamin D and it's central importance to general health and metabolism. Without which, people are likely to lapse into depression and present with a various illness and conditions.

Coming across this article, it occurred to me that Calhoun's experiment took place indoor within a barn. While the intention is to protect the rats from the elements, on reflection, this prescription might not be representative of the ideal living condition.

No, I do not think the experiment has any merits for understanding behaviours unless replicated with sufficient sun exposure factored in. Haaaa (talk) 18:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Long Quotation

The long quotation of Calhoun's experiments might be better off if replaced with a clear summary --OtherwiseDrummer (talk) 03:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I think it would it be nice to have some images on the side to help us visualize what the experiments looked like especially Universe 25. And it would helpful brief descriptions under the images. ~~~~ HandyAndy474$ (talk) 01:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source check

The following sources are the same source:

"Population Density and Social Pathology" (PDF). Scientific American. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-11-21. Retrieved 2015-12-14.

Calhoun, John B. (1962). "Population density and social pathology". Scientific American. 206 (3): 139–148. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0262-139 (inactive 31 January 2024). PMID 13875732.{{cite journal}}:  CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of January 2024 (link)

Calhoun, J. B. (1970). "Population density and social pathology". California Medicine. 113 (5): 54. PMC 1501789. PMID 18730425.

They should be listed only once.42.116.43.19 (talk) 19:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Criticism mentioned

The conditions of the experiments were criticized many times. Critics found many vulnerabilities in the studies. Starting from the questionable quality of biological material and ending with a "closed" space, detached from the natural environment. Yet none of that is mentioned in any way in this article... Shion-ko (talk) Shion-ko (talk) 00:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

At least one of the sources on this article is some random blog going on a racist screed. Article needs work. 2601:14D:5200:9910:F4E7:22C9:F0F6:2075 (talk) 01:13, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]