Talk:Begin to Hope/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Begin to Hope. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
"Single success" section
Shouldn't the contents of this section be moved to, and integrated within, the main "Fidelity (song)" article? Charolastra charolo 22:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Off-topic
I think that we should include a section detailing the reasons why everyone needs to own Begin to Hope. 72.73.233.249 15:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds like that could be done with a few links to reviews about how good for the soul it is. Like in a box underneath the info box. RandomEcho 14:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I love her so much she is my favorite artist of all time!
This is an encyclopedia not a fan site... Dlarrivee 03:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Where are these sale numbers coming from? It is hard to believe.... because a week ago, according to Nielsen SoundScans, "Begin to Hope" in US sold about 200,000 copies... 67.86.197.149 18:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC) .
Where can it be mentioned that the song "Lady" is about Billie Holiday? Wikifried 07:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Begintohope.jpg
Image:Begintohope.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Questionable citaton: 407,000 copies sold??
Is a message board really suitable citation for such a claim? I would think a page with sales count from a web site belonging to the likes of Billboard or her record label would be better. I could just be nit-picking, but come on! A message board? --ComposerWannabe (talk) 09:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Is this right?
"In Australia, the album was certified Gold for sales of more than 35,000."
I don't believe this is true. I thought that Gold certification was awarded for shipment of a certain number of copies, not sales? -Anthony- 11:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Anthony, you're right... RIAA Certifications are based on Shipments and not sales. Also, The album did not debut at #70 on the Billboard 200. If it did, it would not have been eligible for the Heatseeker charts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.67.131.155 (talk) 14:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Sources
- A review from Blender is now dead and there's no archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20100408075835/http://www.blender.com/guide/49172/regina-spektor.html czar 07:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)