Talk:Bee removal
Appearance
This page was proposed for deletion by Gbawden (talk · contribs) on 16 October 2017 with the comment: A case of WP:NOT - not a how to nor a dictionary It was contested by Syrenka V (talk · contribs) on 2017-10-20 with the comment: This article resembles neither a HOWTO nor a dictionary definition |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Vandalism
[edit]This page has been making the rounds on Reddit and now YouTube for it's somewhat laughable intro sentence so expect some increased anon vandalism... EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 00:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Pointless Article
[edit]I feel tired article is rather unneeded and suggest it glitter removal. Everything here can already be found on the beekeeping article. (I'm currently on mobile rn so I have no clue how to create hyperlinks here Rae Dreemurr (talk) 19:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Redundancy
[edit]The first sentence clearly violates WP:REDUNDANCY, but I'm not sure how to rephrase it QoopyQoopy (talk) 22:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Yep you're absolutely right QoopyQoopy – it was an egregious example of the much-loathed formula
X Y Z is a Z of type Y in location X
or whateverthehell. I have ripped out most of the first sentence so now it is inelegant but works a little better. Whether the encyclopaedia desperately needs this article to exist at all is another question for another time ... for now, though, thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 01:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)