Talk:Bedford Purlieus National Nature Reserve

A fact from Bedford Purlieus National Nature Reserve appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 December 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that 211 hectares (520 acres) of woodland near Peterborough, UK, has recorded 462 species of plants?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bedford Purlieus National Nature Reserve.

Wikipedia

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article Expansion

I have drawn very heavily on the Peterken and Welch 1975 symposium for the content of this article. The detail and breadth of that publication may have meant no one since felt the need to write anything else, but that seems unlikely. If anyone knows some detailed up to date information, that would help ensure the article reflects any new information. (Both the Natural England and Forestry Commission pages are so sketchy as to be slightly embarrassing). RobinLeicester (talk) 01:00, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bedford Purlieus National Nature Reserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304000155/http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1000074.pdf to http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1000074.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]