Talk:Bedford OY
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bedford OY article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]See Talk:Bedford M series for question about the difference between the O and M series. Biscuittin (talk) 22:02, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Was the O type really replaced by the R type, which was a 3 ton 4x4? I would have thought that the O type's replacement was probably the S or D type, or in fact the J type and TK given that many O types stayed in service until the '60s, and the R type replaced the QL 3 ton 4x4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.8.227.14 (talk) 10:31, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Brands articles
- Unknown-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military land vehicles articles
- Military land vehicles task force articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Start-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles