Talk:Becherovka

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink: Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	Drink portal This article is supported by WikiProject Spirits (assessed as Low-importance).

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Photos

Found this pic at Becharovka, don't know if you like it better than the one here: Image:Becherovka_300cl.jpg NickelShoe 02:03, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bitters?

I don't believe this is a bitters; it is an herbal liqueur. It is not particularly bitter; actually it's quite sweet and cinnamony/gingery. Badagnani 08:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Despite Becher's reputed sales description of it a century ago, the English word bitters probably didn't then and certainly doesn't now denote liqueurs such as Becherovka. Hey, it's great stuff! Why not just call it a liqueur?

PS. I changed the description a moment ago on the Gin and tonic page. Jrgetsin (talk) 18:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 20:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Approximately"

"Approximately 32 herbs" sounds a little exact. Is it 32 herbs or not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.150.17 (talk) 21:50, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emetic?

I don't get a lot of Google hits for Vedlejší účinky bylinných likérů v geriatrické artritida, has someone actually found and checked this source? - Tournesol (talk) 13:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why did Gryffindor vandalize the article in December 2009?

My changes described the history of Becherovka with the information any encyclopedia user would expect--incl. about the existence of two companies for several decades, etc. All with sources. Now, however, it is not informative at all. But oh well, it's wikipedia. karpaten1 Karpaten1 (talk) 19:14, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The removed content was placed in Jan Becher. Wahrmund (talk) 19:44, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that only after I posted, and I am sorry for the comment. There should be a delete function. Looks good.

Karpaten1 (talk) 00:53, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Anise seed"

Can someone verify if it is flavored with aniseed? There is clearly an anise-like flavor in it, but no such statements should be made without some verifiable source. It may very well be star anise or fennel for all we know.

It doesn't appear to be mentioned on the Becherovka website, and the searches I've performed have proven otherwise fruitless. It is after all a "secret recipe." Such a statement about its ingredients may not be appropriate unless verifiable.

If not verifiable, I suggest we update the page to say something like "hints of..." rather than explicitly stating ingredients which may or may not be in there. -Devin (d.s.ronis) (talk) 11:53, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Lemond (alcohol)

Lemond (alcohol) is a minuscule stub, all of four sentences, and the subject liqueur is a variant of Becherovka itself. It would be better suited as a section in the (fairly short, but not as short as Lemond) Becherovka article. TJRC (talk) 01:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and

Done Klbrain (talk) 23:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]