Jump to content

Talk:Bebe (Inna and Vinka song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBebe (Inna and Vinka song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 6, 2020Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Bebe (Inna and Vinka song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 16:42, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Will get to this shortly. --Kyle Peake (talk) 16:42, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Embed the music video in the infobox as it is on Inna's YouTube
  • "by Global Records on 4 November 2019" → "on 4 November 2019 by Global Records"
  • "while production was handled" → "while the production was handled"
  • "Luganda and English love" → "Luganda, and English love" to avoid any sort of confusion to do with the two languages
  • ""Bebe"'s genre was described" → "the track's genre has been described"
  • Target music critics to the more relevant Music journalism
  • "criticizing it as sonically" → "criticizing the track as sonically"
  • "official YouTube channel simultaneously with the song's digital release" → "YouTube channel on 4 November 2019, simultaneously with the track's digital release" as it should only be mentioned with the word official in the body as this is overdoing for the lead and the release date of the single was said as long ago as the last para
I left out the release date. Stating that the release was simulataneous with the digital premiere is enough for the lead.
  • "were praised by reviewers" → "were praised by critics"
  • ""Bebe" experienced success" → "the track experienced success"

Background and composition

[edit]
  • "while production was handled" → "while the production was handled"
  • "released for digital download" → "released for digital download in various countries"
  • "Luganda and English" → "Luganda, and English"
  • "during a spontaneous studio session leading" either write "...session, leading" or "...session that lead to" depending on whether or not the created content came after of the session or during it for the former and latter, respectively
The concept of the song and etc came with the session. I chose the first option.
  • "commentary noted it" → "commentary noted the track"

Reception

[edit]
  • "was received with"
  • Target music critics to Music journalism
  • Add the editor's name
  • WikiLink Radio France International to Radio France Internationale
  • "praised the singers' vocals" → "praised Inna's vocals"
I left it like that since they praised both Inna and Vinka's vocals.
  • "as "relatively banal [...] The" → "as "relatively banal" and wrote that "The"
  • "Almost boring,"" → "Almost boring"," for consistency
  • "Commercially, "Bebe" achieved" → "Commercially, the track achieved"
  • "on 22 December 2019" → "for the issue date of 22 December 2019"

Music video

[edit]
  • Include alt text for img and remove the ref from it because that is sourced elsewhere
  • Target director of photographer to Cinematographer
  • "incorporated in one scene" → "incorporated in one scene of the video"
  • "the video opens with" → "the music video opens with" as it's a new para
  • "inside of the carriage" → "interior of the carriage"
  • "it sees Inna" → "the video sees Inna"
"it" refers to the interior of the carriage. It has Inna in it, that's why I wrote it like that.
  • Is "sporting" encyclopedic?
I guess so. I've been using it on a lot of other articles as an alternative to "wear", as well as seen it a lot here.
  • "and the latter" → "while the latter wears"
  • Refs 5 and 4 should be in numerical order
  • "was praised by reviewers" → "was praised by critics"
  • "called it one" → "called the clip"

Credits and personnel

[edit]
  • Good

Track listing

[edit]
  • Good

Charts

[edit]
  • Good

Release history

[edit]
  • Good

References

[edit]
  • Archive all with fix dead links
  • Change iTunes Store to being a publisher
  • Target Radio France International to Radio France Internationale
  • Change Media Forest to being a publisher
  • Change Click to Click! with target

Overall

[edit]

 On hold for now, great work though!

@Kyle Peake: Hi! Thank you very much for the review, I've done everything you suggested, except where commented on. Greets and happy new year!! Cartoon network freak (talk) 08:01, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Cartoon network freak: Well done and happy new year, great to hear from you again and to  Pass this! --Kyle Peake (talk) 08:05, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]