Talk:Beaver Creek Resort

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Skiing and Snowboarding High‑importance

	Sports portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plagiarism

Portions of this article are identical to the copy from the official Beaver Creek web page:

http://www.beavercreek.com/the-resort/beaver-creek-history-winter.aspx

Neither page attributes the other, so one is guilty of plagiarism.

Also, the copy, in general, reads like a promotional brochure, not an encyclopedia entry.

Plinehan (talk) 05:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

The section talking about the ownership of the mountain seems quite biased against the resort. I don't know the situation there. Anyone care to rewrite it, or at least clean it up? Adagio 18:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The said issue is pretty much irrelevant to the resort itself. Mainly because it is not an issue exclusive to Beaver Creek or its Vail Resorts owners. The majority of ski areas in Colorado (and the rest of the country for that matter) operate under similar agreements with the US Forest Service. Vail has been the center of controversy among environmentalists groups due to the impact ski resorts have on natural habitats. The recent controversy was fueled buy Vail choosing to expand the ski area. While area expansion is not a new concept or exclusive to Vail Resorts, they received more attention due to the high profile the large company naturally has. I suspect that the opinion of person who wrote the disputed connect stems from this particular controversy. I'm going to remove the questionable content because it is not suitable for this particular article. It may have a place elsewhere, but not here.

Quinn 33 02:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Beavercreek logo.jpg

Image:Beavercreek logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original Idea for Beaver Creek (Dubious)

According to this (not necessarily authoritative) source, Earl Eaton and John Burke (not Pete Seibert) had the original idea for Beaver Creek.^[1]TRosenbaum (talk) 23:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is probably right, and you have a source, so it's can be used. There were ranchers in the family I think ready to develop before Vail was developed, or at about the same time. Truthkeeper (talk) 23:59, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "The History of Beaver Creek Resort". ColoradoSkiHistory.com. Retrieved 2011-12-06. The idea of building a new ski resort in the Beaver and McCoy Creek areas came about in 1956, when Earl Eaton and John Burke discussed future possibilities.

[1] "The History of Beaver Creek Resort". ColoradoSkiHistory.com. Retrieved 2011-12-06. The idea of building a new ski resort in the Beaver and McCoy Creek areas came about in 1956, when Earl Eaton and John Burke discussed future possibilities.

[1]