Talk:Beautiful Creatures (2013 film)

United States: Cinema / New Orleans / South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana - New Orleans.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Romance Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Flop

An editor objects to this film being called a flop. Particularly objecting to the [intro calling it a flop, and does not accept that Forbes is a good enough source to say it is a flop, despite only earning slightly more than its production budget. -- 109.78.24.155 (talk) 17:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would actually argue for calling it a flop, as more sources ([1], [2], [3], [4]) have become available that reference it as such. Disappointment is probably a good compromise, but it's generally referred to as a flop in more than one source now. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How is this not a flop? Half of ticket sales go toward theaters. Also, production budget doesn't include marketing costs. Practically speaking for a film to break even it would need to earn 2-2.5 times its production budget. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:6351:6300:D5B4:E250:B0E8:EBB8 (talk) 18:16, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Different Edits?

I'm just watching the film and finding that the plot as described is severely out of sequence with the version I'm watching. Same events, different order. Are there two edits going around? AKarley (talk) 12:01, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Beautiful Creatures (2013 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]