Talk:Beautiful, Dirty, Rich (Lady GaGa song)

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Beautiful, Dirty, Rich (Lady GaGa song) redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Deletion

This page is for anyone who votes for, aganist or neutral point of view for this article. Your comments are welcome.Dance-pop (talk) 02:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete this page. I think it is important and has been released.Dance-pop (talk) 02:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article. It is unnecessary. Charmed36 (talk) 04:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charmed, it has been released therefore it is necessary and eligible. --Youstinklmao (talk) 04:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About video

Someone can please write a description of video.Dance-pop (talk) 03:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also think that information about the video should be released. Rayboy8 (talk) 22:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Rayboy8[reply]

Yes. It will probably help the articles improvement, if you could, please do and could you please when you come to the ariticle go to "this article's entry and try to help keep the article. Thanks.Dance-pop (talk) 05:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to The Fame (album)

A merge is fine by me for the article, we can merge it to the album page. Seeing that there's hardly any content to offer a wholesome song space, a merge is what it propose. Please share your thoughts everybody. --Legolas!! ^(talktome) 08:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At this stage a redirect back to The Fame is the best course of action. — R ² 10:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, only if it has been announced as the official third single. Perhaps a little of the filming of the video but I personally discourage a section called "Singles" in album-related article. Anyway, when the single charts at least one official chart, it should be restored. --Efe (talk) 11:30, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Donot merge. The disscussion for deletion had no consenus, so create one for the redirection, befre taking any actions. It has a the single been charted in the UK at 89.

Please Dance-pop, stop using your IP. --Legolas!! ^(talktome) 03:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]