Jump to content

Talk:Beat the Chefs/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 07:19, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Nicely done with no real issues. On hold for 14 days. 23W 03:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@23W: Thanks again. I have no idea how you found those sources; perhaps they'll come in handy while I copyedit. As my user page says, this is a CRAZY week for me. Even still, I am planning on getting up early tomorrow to get a jump on some real life work, so perhaps I'll take care of these then, but it'll probably end up waiting until the weekend. Again, much thanks! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 03:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No prob; take your time. 23W 04:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@23W: Okay, I figured since I was up until 11:30 already doing homework, I might as well knock this out. Hopefully it is  Done! Also, I still can't make many promises as to when I'll have time, but I'll see if I can review one of your nominations at some point. Thanks again! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 04:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nice, I'll pass this (made one edit; broke the end of the production section into its own paragraph). Re: my nominations, no sweat if you're busy, but if you could review Lucas Bros. Moving Co., that would be great. 23W 05:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@23W: I was actually looking at Dan Deacon: U.S.A. since I've already reviewed Off the Air (TV series), but if you'd rather me take a look at Lucas Bros. Moving Co., I can do that as well. Thanks again for your review, --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 11:45, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]