Talk:Beat the Chefs/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 07:19, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Link to Jeff Henderson?
- Also pipe to The About Group in the reception section.
- Not sure if these sources are of any use (sorta rehash-y), but here they are: one from the Phoenix New Times, another from the South Florida Business Journal and one from the Las Vegas Sun.
Nicely done with no real issues. On hold for 14 days. 23W 03:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- @23W: Thanks again. I have no idea how you found those sources; perhaps they'll come in handy while I copyedit. As my user page says, this is a CRAZY week for me. Even still, I am planning on getting up early tomorrow to get a jump on some real life work, so perhaps I'll take care of these then, but it'll probably end up waiting until the weekend. Again, much thanks! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 03:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- No prob; take your time. 23W 04:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- @23W: Okay, I figured since I was up until 11:30 already doing homework, I might as well knock this out. Hopefully it is Done! Also, I still can't make many promises as to when I'll have time, but I'll see if I can review one of your nominations at some point. Thanks again! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 04:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nice, I'll pass this (made one edit; broke the end of the production section into its own paragraph). Re: my nominations, no sweat if you're busy, but if you could review Lucas Bros. Moving Co., that would be great. 23W 05:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- @23W: I was actually looking at Dan Deacon: U.S.A. since I've already reviewed Off the Air (TV series), but if you'd rather me take a look at Lucas Bros. Moving Co., I can do that as well. Thanks again for your review, --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 11:45, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nice, I'll pass this (made one edit; broke the end of the production section into its own paragraph). Re: my nominations, no sweat if you're busy, but if you could review Lucas Bros. Moving Co., that would be great. 23W 05:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- @23W: Okay, I figured since I was up until 11:30 already doing homework, I might as well knock this out. Hopefully it is Done! Also, I still can't make many promises as to when I'll have time, but I'll see if I can review one of your nominations at some point. Thanks again! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 04:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- No prob; take your time. 23W 04:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)