Jump to content

Talk:Beat It

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBeat It has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 5, 2009Good article nomineeListed
April 22, 2010Good topic candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article


Etymology

[edit]

The title and the video was most probably inspired from the 1961 musical "West Side Story", where the title is spoken in the starting scene. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnrakInam (talkcontribs) 09:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bound-fighting?

[edit]

At the end of the clip, when the gang-leaders are going to fight, it seems someone tied one hand of each together, after which they engaged in a knife-to-knife battle. Is this some sort of real gang-fighting tradition? I hoped to find more information on this article, but there was nothing about it. Siúnrá (talk) 12:10, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hard Rock

[edit]

In genre i change Rock into Hard Rock because of the conribution of Eddie Van Halen in the song whor are the guitarist of Hard Rock/Glam band Van Halen and because in the sonf there is a Heavy solo of guitar this why i change rock into Hard Rock —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.250.34.67 (talk) 20:27, 1 November 2009 (UTC) I think its both Rock and Hard Rock.[reply]

I would also like to know what other Jackson songs fall into the hard rock category, due to the presence of someone like Eddie van Halen (and later Slash)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.178.228.88 (talk) 15:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think its hard rock... perhaps rock or pop rock. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.21.243 (talk) 03:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its hard rock. It is definitely NOT R&B or pop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Katierj1996 (talkcontribs) 09:07, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the source, and don't add or edit content that would be subjective. Wikipedia aims at genre generality, and in my opinion, it barely qualifies has regular rock.--F-22 RaptörAces High 16:11, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the poster above me. I would call it an R&B or pop song with obvious rock influences (or pop rock). Michael's later flirtations with rock were more "hard rock" than "Beat It". BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 18:55, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No way is this song hard rock, it's pop rock at best. I listen to metal and punk and love this song, but it's ultimately a pop song, please change — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realpunkmusic (talkcontribs) 11:35, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

http://acapell.net/39-michael-jackson-beat-it-acapella.html labeled as dance-pop, no mention of hard rock at all. here is another one saying it is pop rock http://smashingrock.com/michael-jackson-beat-it/ a guitar solo in a pop song doesn't make it hard rock, sorry Realpunkmusic (talk) 20:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

[edit]

Pop, R&B, and Rock genres are both general (see Template:Infobox_musical_artist#Genre) and they umbrella term other genres, including Hard Rock. Please to not change the genres without sourcing, because that is violating neutral point of view, and you will be tagged. Thank You.--F-22 RaptörAces High 19:37, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The source doesn't say that it's pop or R&B! It's just written that the song went to number one R&B and number one pop. If the song went on those charts it's just because, generally, Jackson's music (like the album Thriller) is classified in those genres. Elfast (talk) 14:42, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Musicians

[edit]

Almost two paragraphs on Van Halen's contribution, nothing on Jeff Porcaro's. I've corrected this egregious oversight. 24.187.214.210 (talk) 15:10, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems worth mentioning that Jennifer Batten played the famous solo on all three of Jackson's world tours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.246.128.134 (talk) 17:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 09:48, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the key, range and tempo.

[edit]

The key was previously listed as E minor, the range was listed as b3-d5, and the tempo was listed as 139bpm. The correct information is E flat minor, b-flat3-d-flat5 and 132bpm. The incorrect key had a citation that led to a sheet music site that was written in E minor because it is an easier key to play in. I sited a michaeljackson.com page instead which has the correct key and tempo. Unfortunately, that site erroneously lists the range as b3-d5, but that is clearly an error as those are not scale tones in b-flat major (and not the notes he sings, if you listen.) CuelabCuelab (talk) 15:31, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Beat It. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 24 external links on Beat It. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Beat It. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Release date

[edit]

The information about the release date that is cited in the article is not in the citation next to it. The current citation does not even give any info about the release beyond the Dileo part. I've tagged this information in the article to reflect that. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:15, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]