Talk:Beat Goes On (Madonna song)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 08:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Calvin999 and I am reviewing this article.

Review

No dab links
Two dead links need either removing or replacing.

It was written by Madonna, Pharrell Williams and Kanye West, while production was done by The Neptunes and co-production was handled by Madonna. → It was co-written by West in collaboration with its producers, Madonna and The Neptunes.
only Pharrell Williams and → Pharrell has already been mentioned so you need not mention his full name again, just his surname.
with a different lyrical content than → with different lyrics to
also having additional vocals by Kanye West. → featuring West.
, also featuring bells, handclaps and whistles. → Instrumentation consists of hells, handclaps and whistles.
encourage → encourages
to say whatever they like and do → to say and do
environment → Just doesn't fit in.
However, some dismissed the album's version, criticizing West's appearance. → However, some felt that the leaked version was better than the final version featuring West.
Pharrell Williams and Kanye West also appeared on the backdrops. → I think this is almost irrelevant, but if you want to keep it in, omit their first names and clarify what you mean by backdrops.
The live version was also featured → The live version was also included
announced that record producer → announced that record producers
The pre-chorus had Madonna singing → I'd re-word this
track, with → alongside
with additional rap by West → with rap vocals by West
I think the Reception section is too WP:QUOTEFARM.
Omit West's and Williams' first names in the Live performance section.
Why is Chad Hugo not mentioned in the Credits and personnel section? He is the other half of The Neptunes.
Peak positions are supposed to be listed in separate tables if they were different years.
Publisher parameters are no longer required for references.

Summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Generally well written. There some issues with phrasing etc. but not severe enough to fail. On hold for 7 days. — Calvin999 09:23, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin999 did all of them, just waiting for the Checklinks one. Please take a look. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 11:01, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They are still showing as dead links. — Calvin999 11:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't changed them yet. Checklinks tool is not opening from where I'm accessing internet. Would you please list the two urls here? —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 11:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They are ref 16 (pluggedin.com) and ref 24 (abcnews..go.com) — Calvin999 11:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin999 replaced both the deadlinks, and done. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 13:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome

Pass or Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.