Talk:Beacon UK

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

This page should not be speedily deleted because... It has suddenly become a significant supplier of NHS services in Birmingham. --Rathfelder (talk) 22:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... There is nothing in this article which promotes the organisation. It's entirely neutral --Rathfelder (talk) 22:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability discussion

There was a discussion at the Teahouse that said that Beacon UK renamed itself to Simplify Health. I saw that the company mentions this on their web site, but cannot find a single third party source substantiating this. I actually believe they changed their name - the old url is dead - but the lack of third party coverage makes me question the group's notability, and hence I added the notability hatnote. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The lack of coverage does not mean that the organisation was not notable. It caused a considerable stir. It's clear that it has changed its name, although I cant find any independent coverage. But I'm not sure we need to a third party source for that. Rathfelder (talk) 11:49, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]