Talk:Beacon Fell, Lancashire

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

British and Irish hills

This article is within the scope of WikiProject British and Irish hills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the hills and mountains of Great Britain and Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British and Irish hillsWikipedia:WikiProject British and Irish hillsTemplate:WikiProject British and Irish hillsBritish and Irish hills articles

Article name

Just wondering if it's necessary to have , Lancashire tagged on, since there's no other article to confuse it with. - Dudesleeper / Talk 18:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No it isn't. I created this article when I was still an inexperienced editor. I needed to disambiguate it from Beacon Fell but I overdid it. There are two possible renames to consider: "Beacon Fell Country Park" or "Beacon Fell, Lancashire". Any opinion? --Dr Greg (talk) 13:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I think my picture of Parlick is better than yours, but I won't be mean and remove yours! :-) --Dr Greg (talk) 13:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer "Beacon Fell Country Park" because I usually shy away from including a geographic location unless it's absolutely necessary, for no other reason than personal preference. And I decided to favour your picture of Parlick because it's a more generous profile. - Dudesleeper / Talk 20:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've renamed it (obviously), and also created a redirect from "Beacon Fell, Lancashire" (to stop anyone accidentally creating an article under that name). --Dr Greg (talk) 13:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beacon Fell, Lancashire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081225130423/http://www.defra.gov.uk:80/foodrin/foodname/pfn/products/registered/beacon.htm to http://www.defra.gov.uk/foodrin/foodname/pfn/products/registered/beacon.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beacon Fell, Lancashire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717051625/http://www.thompsondagnall.com/list%20of%20works.htm to http://www.thompsondagnall.com/list%20of%20works.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]