Talk:Beach volleyball at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Women's tournament

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volleyball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Volleyball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolleyballWikipedia:WikiProject VolleyballTemplate:WikiProject VolleyballVolleyball articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Points

How do they use the results of the pool matches to rank the teams? For example, one of the third placed teams, Van Breedam - Mouha, is placed third of the third placed teams, so they're not directly qualified for the playoffs. To me it looks like they should be placed as no. 1 of the third placed teams, and be directly qualified, because they have won more points than the other third placed teams. In other words: How do they rank the teams, if it's not according to most points won? Bib (talk) 12:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, nevermind. They use a points ratio. Bib (talk) 15:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Volleyball at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 16:45, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Beach volleyball at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Women's tournament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]