Talk:Beach Pneumatic Transit

Trains: in New York City High‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	January 17, 2008

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as High-importance).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Expansion

The article's fine as a short entry, but I know there's plenty of info out there which an greatly expand it... is someone up for the challenge?

-Kingpin1005

This article overlaps significantly with the Alfred Beach article. - Richard E 13:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cobble Hill Tunnel

This article currently claims:

Several similar tunnels were found under Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn New York. A locomotive is being sought.^{[citation needed]}

I suspect this is referring to the Cobble Hill Tunnel under Atlantic Avenue which was used by steam locomotives not by vacuum/air pressure locomotives, but was nevertheless an early "subway" tunnel in Brooklyn's history (before Brooklyn was a part of New York City). Can someone find a reliable source to back the claims made in the two sentences? Are they referring to the Cobble Hill Tunnel? Who is looking for a locomotive and why is it relevant to this Beach article? Should the Cobble Hill Tunnel instead be mentioned in the History of the New York City Subway article or perhaps the History of New York City transportation article (or both)? 67.86.73.252 (talk) 01:22, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's unlikely that the locomotive comment is relevant here at all. The Beach train was a loose car driven by fans that were part of the tunnel: there was no locomotive car in any sense and I can't find any reference that suggests that future enhancements would have had one either. I'm removing that phrase. DMacks (talk) 19:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect reference in popular culture

Atomic Robo vol. 6 is "The Ghost of Station X". It's vol. 5 that is "The Deadly art of Science". Not owning either of these graphic novels, I'm not sure which the article should be referring to. 24.2.150.6 (talk) 10:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged the item. Hopefully someone will be able to verify which one is intended there. DMacks (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Beach Pneumatic Transit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]