Talk:Be More Chill

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Novels Start‑class Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

While this is very interesting, and the book was a good read, I'm not sure this is the place to advertise your research. And if it were, I would caution you to format your work better.

Edited

I have majorly edited this page, taking out the original research part and verifiying Ned Vizzini's comments with a link to his website, where he made them.

I am going to remove the warning header. If there are any further issues with this page, it can be tagged again. -Fisheromen 21:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I personally wonder if this is noteworthy enough for an article seperate from the book or the author. Comment? Chercher E. 19:39, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may be right, seeing as how the marketing campaign for this ended a while ago. Maybe it should be merged with the article on Ned Vizzini. --Fisheromen 00:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm personally in favor of that, but I'm relatively new, and don't know how to do such moves. Chercher E. 00:07, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Me neither. --Fisheromen 01:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC) So, should we call in someone smart? User Prodego has been fairly nice and helpful to me. You know anyone who can do these things? Chercher E. 19:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What you are talking about isn't moving the page, but merging it. However, I am not sure we need an article on this at all, we don't have an article on the book, so it seems silly to have an article on something in the book. If you think this information is important enough for an article, an article should probably be made on the book, and this information put there. If you don't think this information needs an article, tag it as {{prod|article about an unimportant fictional pill from a book}}, and assuming no one removes the tag, it will be deleted by an administrator five days from now. If someone removes the tag, let me know, and I'll explain what that means (some info about this can be found here) Prodego ^talk 19:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Placing tag now. Chercher E. 19:19, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  hey, i was just wondering about one particular line: "Jeremy meets his best friend Michael Mell, who is as much of a dork as he is."  but in the book, it says that because of Michael's headphones, he is able to be social with any of the cliques in the school. hmmmm... what do you think? even if he is a dork, he's not on the same level as jeremy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.235.230.231 (talk) 03:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael can sit with pretty much anyone he wants, and they ignore him because of his headphones. Not exactly social success. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.135.246 (talk) 04:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is not social success, however at one point Jeremy does say that Michael doesn't need a squip, because he at least has some chance/social skills. In the end, he is also able to get a girlfriend without a squip and interact socially at a party. I would agree that he is not on the same level as Jeremy is. 184.94.125.63 (talk) 07:53, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i'm pretty sure nobody has really updated or looked at this page for a while now, but i'm going to suggest that we include the book cover(s) Xxriaa (talk) 22:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yeah we should. also , perhaps somebody ought to monitor the page and make sure no musical fans add false facts ( like michaels moms ) to the book page

Applejuiceandpeachh (talk) 03:31, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]