Talk:Bayesian multivariate linear regression

Statistics High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics Mid‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Does this page need to exist given Bayesian linear regression? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Red.devil.ade (talk • contribs) 13:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--129.132.224.85 (talk) 13:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is some confusion here. This page is discussing Bayesian multivariate linear regression, but there is no page on multivariate linear regression from a non-Bayesian perspective. I think people are getting confused between multiple regression and multivariate regression. The former has a scalar as the response whereas the latter has a vector as a response. There is a link to 'multivariate linear regression' but it (wrongly) takes you to 'The General Linear Model' which would be appropriate for multiple regression.

Blaise (talk) 16:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the references?

I'm trying to make some sense out of this article, but there are no citations provided. There are three references listed at the bottom, with no indication of how they are relevant or where they were used in the writing of the article. For example, the results contained in "Posterior Distribution" look like they could be useful, but without citing a reference, it is difficult to confirm or logically follow this result in any meaningful way.

Perhaps the author of this section could point us to specific pages in some literature in which this is discussed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.173.166.77 (talk) 02:14, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]