Talk:Bay Ridge Avenue station/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: 1.02 editor (talk · contribs) 04:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Starting the next review. 1.02 editor (T/C) 04:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Some comments:
- 'Citation needed' for these two portion:
- This station was overhauled in the late 1970s. If possible specify the date.
- Prior to the 2017 renovation, the entrance was exit-only. Remove this part or specify the source.
- Overall, article seems decent.--ZKang123 (talk) 08:59, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
In addition to that,
- 'entirely closed for several months' do specify how many months
- This seems to have been removed epicgenius (talk) 17:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- for ref 15, pls specify which page of the pdf is refrenced.
- Done
- 'The award for Package 1...' shouldn't award be contract?
- That is the proper name of the contract. epicgenius (talk) 17:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Will be putting the article on hold for now. once the relevant changes have been made i will be passing the article. 1.02 editor (T/C) 01:57, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- @1.02 editor: I have completely redone the article, which has addressed most of your comments. Due to Passover, I won't be able to do any editing from tonight until Thursday evening at the earliest. I am still committed to addressing your concerns with the article. Thanks for your patience and stay safe.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- @1.02 editor: thanks for the review. I think Kew Gardens 613 has fixed all these issues. epicgenius (talk) 17:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Issues have been addressed, recent edits do not defer the stability of the article, passing.