Talk:Bay Freeway (Seattle)

Bay Freeway (Seattle) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 2, 2015. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: Washington Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Locations

Washington

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the U.S. Roads Portal in May 2015.
	A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in May 2015.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Mid-importance).

External image

I can't see much reason to leave that "external image" of the map as external. It would qualify for Commons. We have literally thousands of images from the Seattle Municipal Archives. As it says on the linked page, "Photographs contained in this database are public record and do not require permission for use, unless otherwise stated in the Notes field. Please cite our images Courtesy of the Seattle Municipal Archives and include the item number." Basically, that's equivalent to CC-0 with a request for attribution. - Jmabel | Talk 02:50, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: Would it be worth talking to the Archives about outright stating their license policy with a CC equivalent? I'm always hesitant to upload stuff from archives that don't have a really direct and clear copyright notice. Sounder Bruce 04:25, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SounderBruce: I've talked with them about this before. Admittedly it's been a few years, but at the time they said that they were more comfortable with their current wording than with something from a third party like Creative Commons. The problem is that they are concerned about trying to vet so much material and find the items on which some third party might own copyright. They've always been very generous when there is any specific question. E.g. Commons:Template:PD-Seattle-Neighborhood-Atlas. When they put stuff on Flickr (3-5 images a week) they use Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic; they've remarked to me that they never would complain if someone failed to attribute them, but they felt it clarified their desire to be attributed.

I think the statement on their own site is actually clear enough but if anyone doubts that for specific material, I am sure you can get them to grant a specific license through OTRS. As I say, they've always been very generous. - Jmabel | Talk 04:38, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]