Talk:Baxstrom v. Herold
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wildly incorrect holding
[edit]I don't have time at the present to update the accuracy of this article, but it is wildly inaccurate. This case has absolutely nothing to do with the Double Jeopardy Clause, but instead it has to do with the Equal Protection Clause under the Fourteenth Amendment (see the ref in the article itself). Marking it as disputed for assistance. 2601:500:8300:399:5923:AC28:C08E:D09B (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Stub-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Unknown-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases articles
- Stub-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles