Talk:Baxalta

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Notability tag

Notability tag restored. As sourced it fails WP:CORP. A primary source and one website whose credibility is questionable and the articles read like veiled press releases. This would fail AfC 100% of the time.Sulfurboy (talk) 18:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sulfurboy, I appreciate you taking the time to explain why you tagged this. XyZAn, do you have any response? Do you think it meets WP:CORP? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Boleyn, my worry is that it seems a majority of the sources are press releases and thus possibly unreliable, but most certainly primary. I know you're an experienced editor and trying to create a page in good faith. But I really feel this is probably a case of WP:TOOSOON, as the company was only created a month ago, so what we get is basically all these PRs and clouded ones through sites that push stocks. Not that I think this needs to go to AfD or anything, but just something to keep in mind in the future. I'm going to remove the tag, along with the PR sources and in place put a more ref tag. Cheers, Sulfurboy (talk) 19:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sulfurboy, Boleyn. Yes I think this meets WP:CORP through the fact that three of the five sources are secondary, but also back up the claims made through primary sources. Cheers, XyZAn (talk) 19:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

XyZAn, can you point out which three, you're happy with? One I'm almost 100% is a press release and the other two look like very well veiled ones. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely convinced by the sources either, and found it hard to separate the notability of the parent company from this. I certainly wouldn't look to take this to AfD, although a merge to parent company would be a possible solution if reliable sources aren't there. Thank you both for your hard work on this, Boleyn (talk) 20:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baxalta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150819083455/http://finance.yahoo.com:80/news/blood-publishes-phase-iii-data-130000681.html to http://finance.yahoo.com/news/blood-publishes-phase-iii-data-130000681.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]