Talk:Bawangaja

India: Madhya Pradesh / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Jainism Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Jainism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Jainism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects. Guidelines: Manual of Style – Naming conventionsJainismWikipedia:WikiProject JainismTemplate:WikiProject JainismJainism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I only made grammatical changes, such as adding the word "the" that non-English speakers always miss. Also, changed the word "oranise" to the correct spelling "organize" with the letter z.

I didnt touch any of the substance of this post. However, I do have a concern regarding the emotions of the face of this statue. It's just a plain stone-faced statue without any emotion at all. The writer claims there is a "perfect balance of all of the emotions such as joy, happiness, etc." The reason I raise this point, is because it sounds like a Jain "devotee" had written that. It sounds like something a person emotionally vested in their religion would think as part of their belief, rather than it actually objectively being the case. I'm no art critic, so I left that part alone. Perhaps a unbiased art critic that is not a Jain devotee could weigh in on this? I would make the same request for a non-Christian to weigh in on Christian art. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nihilianth (talk • contribs) 17:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]