Talk:Batu, East Java

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Flag of East Java.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Batu City square.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvio

It appears that these 11 edits by Softwarestatistik (talk · contribs) on 16 February may have been copied in part from https://al-pakri.blogspot.com/2019/08/wisata-ke-surabaya-petik-apel-di-kota.html (Earwig 40%). There were no archive copies of the blog at archive.org before today; at archive.is there is this snapshot from 2019, and wikiwix has the same thing but at that time the page was almost entirely in Indonesian. I'm unable to determine the direction of copy. Mathglot (talk) 20:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mathglot, thank you for pinging me on Softwarestatistik's talk page about this matter. From what I can tell, the edit consisted of an unattributed machine translation of the "Tourism" section from the corresponding article at the Indonesian Wikipedia. Running that article through Google Translate gives me an exact match for the text they added. The Blogspot that you linked above is a Wikipedia mirror and the 40% overlap was already present before their edits. Since their edits have already been removed from the article, I don't think any further action is needed here. DanCherek (talk) 20:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for investigating this further. Mathglot (talk) 21:10, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]