Talk:Battlefield (disambiguation)

There is a draft for this page located at DRAFT:Battlefield.

Redirect?

How does this not redirect to Battle? LCS check (talk) 15:13, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because the title "Battlefield" refers to more than just the military location of a battle... there are songs, and other topics that are named "Battlefield". Blueboar (talk) 02:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But all come from the term meaning the military location of the battle. LCS check (talk) 20:48, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation with possibilities Suggestion

It may be possible to expand this page into an article about the characteristics of battlefields. The existing disambiguating links may be placed at the top of the resulting article within a note stating "Battlefield may also refer to (...)". a CLoG? | unCLoG 01:01, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multi-move request

Requested move 18 July 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. AustralianRupert (talk) 03:47, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

– These moves are required to allow Draft:Battlefield to be moved into mainspace when it becomes approved. a CLoG? | unCLoG 14:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support, clear primary topic as to both terms, and the draft has been substantially improved in the past few weeks, and is now very likely to improve further. bd2412 T 14:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:32, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Battlefield - which should have an article. Very weak Oppose Battleground as this is used in modern English in an informal context and is often associated with other subjects (e.g. battleground states).Icewhiz (talk) 14:32, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Interesting that battleground states isn't even linked (at the moment) from the DAB page, though. — AjaxSmack 23:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Primary topic deserving substantive article. Monstrelet (talk) 14:47, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support, The primary topic is pretty clear. The current page at draft should have this title. Eventhorizon51 ^(talk) 12:48, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support, agree with just about everything above. Alansplodge (talk) 16:50, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support the first move; agnostic on the second. I came here expected to oppose a move of a DICDEF. How wrong I was. Draft:Battlefield is a fine article. — AjaxSmack 23:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.