Jump to content

Talk:Battle of the Pelennor Fields/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 04:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

[edit]

1. Prose ✓ Pass

2. Verifiability ✓ Pass

3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass

4. Neutral ✓ Pass

5. Stable ✓ Pass

6. Illustrations ✓ Pass

7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass

Comments

[edit]

1.

  • Pelennor Fields is linked in the article, but it redirects to Minas Tirith, which is itself a redirect now. Eventually, a bot will fix the double redirect to send Pelennor Fields to the Gondor article, where all mentions of "Pelennor Fields" are in the larger string "Battle of the Pelennor Fields". Probably better just to unlink.
Done.
  • " where king Theodoric I " - I think King should be capitalized, since it's used as a proper title here.
Done.
  • "The Great Darkness blotted out the sun." - Readers not familiar with the Lord of the Rings will likely need context as to what the Great Darkness is
Glossed.
  • Nazgul and Ringwraiths are duplinks
Done.
  • Probably remove the links to Imrahil, it goes to Gondor without a specific section, and is essentially a duplink
Done.
  • Given that Minas Tirith is now a redirect, it's not particularly helpful to have the link to the gate section of that article.
Done.
  • Shadowfax is just a redirect back to Gandalf, so it's basically a duplink
Done.
  • Rohirrim is a duplink, Rohan already linked
Done.
  • Sauron is a duplink
Done.
  • Haradrim is a duplink
Done.
  • "The Witch-king exchanged his horse for his winged steed " - The link to winged steed is just a duplink to fell beast
Done.
  • Imrahil is linked multiple times
Done.
  • Denethor is a duplink
Done.
  • Anduin is a duplink
Done.
  • Rangers of the North is a duplink
Done.

2.

  • Ref 10 needs an accessdate
Added.

3.

4.

5.

6.

  • Fair use rationale for the movie still is for a different article, it just needs a few tweaks to reflect current usage.
Done.

7.

Good work. Passing. Hog Farm (talk) 17:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_the_Pelennor_Fields/GA1&oldid=955410678"