Talk:Battle of the Diamond

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Northern Ireland Mid‑importance

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Strange reference

Judging from the heated discussion on the guestbook of this site ^ From The formation of the Orange Order in The Orange Order from the Evangelical Truth website

that is used as the only reference does it seem appropriate to use such a contested 'reference' #Dionysus99 17:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will reference the article before I remove the blog site. --Domer48 (talk) 09:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have referenced up the article and added some historical accounts. I will over time add additional references and sources. I removed the blog site, and replaced the text with sourced text. I added section heads to help with the formatting. --Domer48 (talk) 17:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page needs serious work, preferably by a Hindu or a Muslim or a Shintoist, somebody who doesn't have a Catholic or Protestant drum to beat. A more propagandist article is rarely seen on the Wikipedia. Sukiari (talk) 20:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your definitely right in your description of the article and no surprise going by who was the main editor until I rewrote the article, cutting out selectively chosen historical accounts from biased people and the obvious anti-Protestant bias in it. A lot of stuff in this article had no direct relevance to it and most of the rest is now covered in my re-written Peep o' Day Boys article, which I've linked to several times in this article. Mabuska ^(talk) 18:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I may also have more stuff to add to the article to give more details on bits and pieces. Mabuska ^(talk) 18:38, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of the Diamond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131209153758/http://danwinterscottage.co.uk/battle/ to http://www.danwinterscottage.co.uk/battle/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]