Jump to content

Talk:Battle of the Brazos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Logos

[edit]

I took out the two school athletics logos. Unfortunately, Wikipedia's image use policy is overly draconian and would probably not allow the logos of the two schools to be used here. If the rivaly itself has a logo then that would be usable under US "fair use" laws as well as Wikipedia policy. If there is such a logo please add it. Johntex\talk 23:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

[edit]

What do we think about adding this photo: Image:Bearsbeataggies.jpg into the article. It is the only Baylor-A&M photo I can find at the moment. On the one hand, I suppose it could be criticized as being NPOV to include a photo of one winning team and not the other. On the other hand, it is not like we would be claiming Baylor is usually the winner. One could argue that the strength of the celebration was an indicator of the event being someone unusual. Thoughts? Johntex\talk 23:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't mind that photo. I found some fair use pictures on Flickr of the '06 game. Maybe we can add one or two of those photos. I'll see if I can find more pictures. --Blueag9 (Talk | contribs) 01:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really dont think that image was created by the uploader Corpx 16:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]

I assume the numbers in the infobox are the years the corresponding team won. However, they don't make sense to me. For instance, 1901 appears in the A&M column once and in the Baylor column twice. Several dates are repeated in the A&M column. Also, were there no ties? →Wordbuilder (talk) 00:21, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the early 1900s, A&M played a few opponents 2-3 times a season, including Baylor. In 1901 for example, A&M was 1–2 against Baylor and 0–2 against Texas (Reference) Ties certainly need to be included in the table, though I'm not sure how to work with the code so that they can be nicely placed in it. I'll figure it out sooner or later if someone else doesn't add the ties. Thanks for the heads up! BlueAg09 (Talk) 02:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Makes perfect sense now. Thanks for the explanation. →Wordbuilder (talk) 03:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Boise State–Nevada rivalry which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Battle of the Brazos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]