Talk:Battle of the Barrier Forts

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of the Barrier Forts article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Asian / Chinese / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

"Defeat" for whom?

The summary says the battle was considered a defeat by the British. It was a battle between the Americans and the Qing Chinese and the Americans won. So the sentence seems illogical. I realize that the war was between the British and the Qing. So had the British already tried to pass the forts and been defeated? I don't know enough to try to revise the entry, but someone knowledgeable should do something to make the entry pass thelogic test. RodArm (talk) 03:51, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of the Barrier Forts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150922122705/https://www.mcu.usmc.mil/historydivision/Pages/Publications/Publication%20PDFs/Barrier_Forts.pdf to https://www.mcu.usmc.mil/historydivision/Pages/Publications/Publication%20PDFs/Barrier_Forts.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name

You kids need to stop fighting over whether to put "China" or "Qing dynasty" in the infobox. This edit war is stupid. On the same day the protection expired, it continued. You guys have been fighting longer than the actual battle took place. I've put "Qing China" as a compromise. This issue has also been discussed before at Talk:First Opium War#Name of China. Spellcast (talk) 17:09, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]