Talk:Battle of Zinjibar

Military history: Asian / Middle East / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Splitting the article

There should be a separated article for the 4 Feb 2012 battle, this article is about the May-September 2011 battle. 222.255.197.48 (talk) 18:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am guessing you mean the 4 March battle, though I agree that is significant enough to warrant a separate article - hundreds of well prepared militants overran an Army base, killing more than a 100 soldiers and taking 55 prisoner as well as heavy equipment - surely the biggest upset the local branch of Al Qaeda has pulled in a while and quite possibly the beginning of a shift in tactics. Skycycle (talk) 18:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It may be good for it to have its own article but its still part of the Battle of Zinjibar due to the ongoing siege. Or we close this battle as ending back in September (May-September) when the military made the last attempt to take back the city, after which they made no more attempts, thus making it a Al Qaeda victory, and the attack that happened on 3 March being a separate conflict. EkoGraf (talk) 01:55, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you are right, it does seem to be part of the same conflict... However the military did lose the first battle in the summer and then they proceeded to claim they had retaken the town - something which now appears to be impossible. Maybe leave it as it is and just structure it better and add content? Skycycle (talk) 12:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well now that I think about it I'm more inclined to the first battle being from May to September (Al-Qaeda victory) and this now being a totaly new thing, since there was a too long period of inactivity on the frontline between the two (October-February, five months). EkoGraf (talk) 17:22, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Linking this article

As this article is on AQAP/AAS-activities in Yemen, it should be included into the [[Category:Terrorism in Yemen]] (and the similarly named article). 83.85.143.141 (talk) 03:22, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Battle of Zinjibar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Zinjibar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]