Talk:Battle of Zaoyang–Yichang

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Chinese / Japanese / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	World War II task force

Japan: Military history Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:18, November 28, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Potential source

JACAR(アジア歴史資料センター)Ref.C11110494300、昭和１６年１月に於ける支那総軍統計（附図７枚入り）　昭和１６年１月(防衛省防衛研究所)。 This is first hand document, even it has some part unclear, I think it have some valueable, sorry my English is no good — Preceding unsigned comment added by JassonTodd (talk • contribs) 16:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JACAR(アジア歴史資料センター)Ref.C11110494300、昭和１６年１月に於ける支那総軍統計（附図７枚入り）　昭和１６年１月(防衛省防衛研究所)。 This is Japan military confidential files, about casualties of Japanese troop in China from 1939 to 1940, I think it has a value for this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by JassonTodd (talk • contribs) 08:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JasonTodd: It's a unverifiable non-English source. It's better to stick with the common casualty numbers listed in most reliable western sources. Den-Drater 20:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

But this is a first hand document, I believe it has a value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JassonTodd (talk • contribs) 00:30, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

G'day all, I have protected this article for a short period due to edit warring. @JassonTodd and Qweroa: Instead of edit warring, please discuss the pros and cons of your desired edits here. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 05:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]