Talk:Battle of Velestino/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:31, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:31, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
- External links OK, no DABs
- Most images need a PD-US tag including the CC0 images
- Done.
- Link Thessaly
- Where? It is already linked in the lede, infobox, and first occurrence in the body.
- were mobilized again I don't think that mobilized is the right word here
- Fixed.
- engineers or engineer? It's usually the later in English when used as an adjective.
- Fixed.
- Are Evzone battalions really notable?
- They were independent formations, established in the 1860s and not integrated into regiments until 1913, so I'd say they warrant an article, or at least a link that will point to some overarching article (lots of work remains to be done at Evzones)...
- We generally don't find individual battalions notable, but if you can find a really good history of all the Evzone units...--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- They were independent formations, established in the 1860s and not integrated into regiments until 1913, so I'd say they warrant an article, or at least a link that will point to some overarching article (lots of work remains to be done at Evzones)...
- close order formation hyphen between close order
- Done.
- danger of being cut off by the Rizomylos stream Not sure what you mean here
- Clarified, hopefully.
- quiet on that day delete "on"
- Done.
- Down to 29 April, more late.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- What's a sappers-firemen company?
- Clarified, hopefully.
- The rest looks good.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Sturmvogel 66, any further comments/suggestions? Cheers, Constantine ✍ 14:10, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- No, not that I can think of.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)