Talk:Battle of Vauchamps/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   The first sentence of the lede is too long, but the lede itself is way too short. It needs to summarize the entire article in a bit more detail than is currently given.

Done.--Alexandru Demian (talk) 21:37, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

1. B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Books need place of publication.

Done.--Alexandru Demian (talk) 21:37, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

2. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

3. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

4. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

5. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

6. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: