Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Tripolje/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 11:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Will get to this shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Section 1;
    • Second only to "the" imperial dignity
    • Lazarević ordered Branković "to be" imprisoned
  • Section 2;
    • Link Balkans
    • the Lazarević brother's crossing; I think just "Vuk's crossing" is enough
    • Süleyman sent one of his commanders to monitor Branković,[4] to ensure that he was truly loyal; What was the result? What did the commander report regarding Branković's loyalty?
  • Section 3;
    • stay "as" a "good shepherd of the flock"
    • As he was unable to resist Branković's pressure, it was Lazarević who decided the battle; this sentence is a bit vague, I suggest you to reword it
  • Section 4; all good
  • 2.0% confidence, violation unlikely

:Excellent article, very well written. I am very much impressed with the style and the flow the article is in. Good work.

With a lot of POV and source-related issues, the article is far away from the GA criteria. Request the nominator to first resolve the issues on talk page and renominate the article after the improvements. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]