Talk:Battle of Tawahin/GA2
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 00:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Constantine ✍
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 00:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other FAs)
Done
Check for WP:RS: Done Cross-checked with other FAs: Byzantine navy, Sack of Amorium, Thomas the Slav, Byzantine civil war of 1341–47, Siege of Constantinople (717–18)
|
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
- c. No original research: Done
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
Cross-checked with other FAs: Byzantine navy, Sack of Amorium, Thomas the Slav, Byzantine civil war of 1341–47, Siege of Constantinople (717–18)
|
b. Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. Thanks, Constantine, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking the time to review this and thanks again to Ro4444 (talk · contribs) for improving the article and making it that much more comprehensive. Constantine ✍ 11:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)