Talk:Battle of Tabu-dong/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 02:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Generally good prose. A couple instances of awkward speech, fixed those.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Battery of well formatted reliable sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Very excellent work here again.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Cropped one of the maps

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Well written article. Unequivocally passes GA criteria, but additional images, and improvement of prose would be required for FA. Also think expansion would be required.