Talk:Battle of Sullivan's Island
Appearance
Battle of Sullivan's Island has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 28, 2012, June 28, 2016, June 28, 2018, June 28, 2021, and June 28, 2023. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RfC: Is "The battle's pain" section relevant?
[edit]The "The battle's pain" section on this page appears to be an unrelated narrative; it has little or no relation to the facts of the battle.
- The section is essentially an personal essay, and, in my view, quite unencyclopedicἲὶῌ. I recommend it be deleted from the article - I'd do it myself right now, but wouldn't want to pre-empt the result of the RfC. Anaxial (talk) 18:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not so hesitant; it's gone. --Richard (talk) 05:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Reason for move?
[edit]This action is conventionally known by "Battle of Sullivan's Island" -- this name is what is used in history books. Can the move of this article to "Action of June 28, 1776" please be supported here by citations to relevant and reliable sources? Magic♪piano 02:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Sullivan's Island/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:43, 18 December 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Link the British regiments.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- I took care of these things; thanks for taking time to do the review! Magic♪piano 21:15, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class South Carolina articles
- Mid-importance South Carolina articles
- WikiProject South Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- GA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- GA-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- GA-Class American Revolutionary War articles
- American Revolutionary War task force articles