Jump to content

Talk:Battle of South Mountain

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Names

[edit]

I changed the 3 gap names to correspond with the USGS GNIS names:

Turners Gap: https://edits.nationalmap.gov/apps/gaz-domestic/public/search/names/587919 which has several variant names, none of which are Turner's Gap.

Crampton Gap: https://edits.nationalmap.gov/apps/gaz-domestic/public/search/names/583960 which has the variant name Cramptons Gap (no apostrophe).

Fox Gap: https://edits.nationalmap.gov/apps/gaz-domestic/public/search/names/588773 which has variant names Foxs Gap and Fox's Gap.

It may be that Civil War era text has them as Turner's, Crampton's, and Fox's, but it still seems better to use the modern standard placenames, no? Pfly 20:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. The convention we use is to follow the formats in the secondary sources that we cite as References. In some cases, historians use the more modern, unpunctuated, name, such as Battle of Stones River (which was originally Stone's River), but in this case all of the references cited use the historical names. (Another example of using historical names that deviate from current government usage is Battle of Sayler's Creek.) Hal Jespersen 20:50, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

[edit]

Embedded comment moved from the article itself (by Hal Jespersen (talk) 20:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)):[reply]

I find that hard to believe. The lost copy of Special Orders 191 was intended for D.H. Hill. Surely, there would be immediate evidence during the Maryland campaign to prove that D.H. Hill not see the orders. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RebelRouser1862 (talk • contribs) 06:56, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The order was duplicated by Jackson and sent separately. One of the two copies was lost, the other reaching Hill. Hal Jespersen (talk) 15:13, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Secondary Source

[edit]

I would recommend using "Before Antietam" by John Michael Priest as your definitive secondary source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.168.53.81 (talk) 21:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see, this is currently a relatively short article that is mostly using generic military history texts for sources. If you would like to expand the article using your recommended text, you are invited to do so. Hal Jespersen (talk) 23:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

V Corps

[edit]

Did the 22nd Regiment Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry and the V Corps (Union Army) fought in this battle? The gravestone of a soldier who was part of the 22nd which was then part of the V Corps claims he fought at the Battle of South Mountain but can this be possible?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:59, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of South Mountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of South Mountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_South_Mountain&oldid=1216773605"