Talk:Battle of Snyder's Bluff/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Unlimitedlead (talk · contribs) 21:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
@Hog Farm: Nice to work with you again. I can take this review on soon. Unlimitedlead (talk) 21:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
- Duplicate links: William T. Sherman; Chickasaw Bayou; John C. Pemberton
- Fixed
- Link American Civil War in the body?
- Done
- Ditto with Federal.
- Done, although it's a bit of an awkward link to Union (American Civil War). "Union" was the historically prevalent turn, but the academic tide is turning against it's use.
- And with Confederate States of America.
- Done
- And Mississippi River?
- Done
- "and contained 16 heavy cannon" Perhaps this is military talk, but is "cannons" not the right word to use here
- Either way is considered acceptable, I believe
- "Historians William L. Shea and Terrence J. Winschel..." False title?
- Fixed
- @Hog Farm: Just some minor quibbles to take care of and then this article should be set to become a GA. Unlimitedlead (talk) 18:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Unlimitedlead: - Thanks for the review! Replies above. Hog Farm Talk 02:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: Another article well done! I will promote this article to GA status; I hope to see more quality content from you very soon. Unlimitedlead (talk) 02:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Unlimitedlead: - Thanks for the review! Replies above. Hog Farm Talk 02:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: Just some minor quibbles to take care of and then this article should be set to become a GA. Unlimitedlead (talk) 18:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)