Talk:Battle of Siping
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject China Assessment
[edit]WPArkansas Bot has assessed this article for WikiProject China per another WikiProject's assessment. If you disagree with this assessment, feel free to change it. If the bot made an error, please leave a message at Coffee's talk page. --WPArkansas Bot (talk) 01:47, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Further battles of Siping
[edit]It seems there were further battles for possession of Siping and apparently the Nationalists retook it in May 1946, according to David Tenner in Google Group 'soc.history.what-if'[1], who also quotes some further sources:
"I have recently been reading "Marshall's Mission in the Context of U.S.S.R.-China-U.S. Relations" by Andrei M. Ledovsky (historian and former Soviet diplomat). http://www.marshallfoundation.org/pdf/19Ledovsky--Soviet-China-US%20r... Anyway, Ledovsky discusses one of Marshall's most controverisal decisions: 'Why Did Marshall Keep Chiang Kai-shek from Marching to Harbin After the Victorious Battle for Siping?' In his paper 'Chiang Kai-shek and Marshall: The Catastrophes of Szepingchieh'[Siping], presented at a symposium in Taipei, Professor Donald Gillin of Vassar College reproached Marshall for allegedly keeping Chiang Kai-shek from following up the victory in the Siping battle of May 1946 by proceeding to Harbin and defeating the remaining Communist troops there. ..." WestNab (talk) 21:22, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class Chinese military history articles
- Chinese military history task force articles
- Start-Class China-related articles
- Mid-importance China-related articles
- Start-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject China articles