Talk:Battle of Sierra Bullones

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Sierra Bullones article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: African / European / Spanish C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force
	European military history task force
	Spanish military history task force

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 September 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

Nominated for deletion

Hi @Tahanido, I understand that you think this page should be removed because it lacks reliable sources and information. I agree with you so I will add more reliable sources and information. RobertJohnson35 (talk) 16:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added more citations in the article, do you think this is enough to be considered reliable? If not, I will add more, thanks. RobertJohnson35 (talk) 17:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @RobertJohnson35

Can you just expand it and add neutral source. Thanks Tahanido (talk) 17:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will expand it, but which sources are not neutral and why? RobertJohnson35 (talk) 17:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the sources you have used are Spanish. You have to include sources from non-Spanish historians as well to ensure a more balanced and neutral perspective. Tahanido (talk) 17:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, 4 of the 5 sources in the article are Spanish: two of them are diaries of people who participated in the war, one of them is from the Cambridge University, one of them is from the Royal Academy of History and I do not know the other one because it already was in the Spanish wikipedia. I do not think the problem is that they are in another language, in any case, the problem should be that they are not reliable sources. RobertJohnson35 (talk) 18:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]