Talk:Battle of Shrewsbury

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Shrewsbury article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 21, 2008.

Military history: British / European / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Shropshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shropshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Shropshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShropshireWikipedia:WikiProject ShropshireTemplate:WikiProject ShropshireShropshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Numbers

The numbers given regarding the size of the army and extent of casualties are impossibly high. I've added a quick note to try and combat this, but the article really needs an overhaul. It reads more like a chronicle than an analysis of battle. Perhaps one day I'll have time to come back to it. Anyone else interested in the meantime should check out the Barker and Prestwich books referenced, and other reputable historians. Gwinva 03:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Self contradiction

The King's forces sustained much greater losses than the rebels, in fact Henry IV very nearly lost both his life and his throne.
This contradicts the Casualties and losses summary which shows 10,000 rebel losses v 5,000 royal losses. I will use the English Heritage figures. JRPG (talk) 18:26, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One damned thing after another

1400 Shrewsbury Described in the book titled above where timetravelers visit. 174.240.64.108 (talk) 18:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]