Talk:Battle of Schliengen

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Schliengen article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Battle of Schliengen is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 25, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
October 26, 2014	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
January 6, 2015	Featured article candidate	Promoted
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 24, 2023, and October 24, 2024.
Current status: Featured article

Military history: European / French / German / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	German military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Austria: Holy Roman Empire Low‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Holy Roman Empire task force.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

images

I'm looking for an image of the battle, or a map. I'll probably have to make one, so it will happen later. Auntieruth55 (talk) 01:24, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Who is the "enthusiastic duke" in the picture? I guessed it was the Duke of Enghien but had to go to the link to make sure. Please label. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image licensing

Hi Ruth, congrats on achieving A-Class for this! The review was closed a bit before I expected it, and it doesn't look like there was a dedicated image review. I know there was one for GAN but the portrait gallery has been added since then... I think File:Jean-Victor Moreau.jpg and File:Général Ferino1.jpg should have US copyright tags, while a tag on File:Gouvion-saint-cyr.jpg looks broken. Could you attend to these please? Tks/cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:51, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i THINK I've fixed this (at least once before). Please check if I have it right? auntieruth (talk) 16:00, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Tks Ruth. I think Moreau should probably have the same {{PD-Art|PD-old-100-1923}} as Ferino, but other than they look okay to me now. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Schliengen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110307145219/http://www.waldwissen.net/technik/land_raum/fva_rheinkorrektur/index_DE to http://www.waldwissen.net/technik/land_raum/fva_rheinkorrektur/index_DE

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]