Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Santa Clara

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Background

[edit]

I removed background because it was completely irrelevant and obvious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.127.240.77 (talk) 14:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed

[edit]

Hi, it would be great if this article could be expanded a little. I'm currently rather mystified as to how a force of about 340 guerrillas defeated a defending force 10 times their size. Did most of the Government troops simply sit on their hands during the battle and do no fighting? Is that why the rebels won? This article is silent on that - it would be useful if someone could do a bit of research. Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.174.8.253 (talk) 08:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Did most of the Government troops simply sit on their hands during the battle and do no fighting?"

They did do fighting but when push came to shove they would scatter. They weren't fighting for anything they believed in, just a crappy wage. Revolutionaries were fighting for no wage, thus they very willing to fight and die. A battle of wills. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.216.55.13 (talk) 03:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"armoured" train?

[edit]

Just a comment, but based on the photographs provided of a carriage from the "armoured train", it appears not to be a true armoured train, but a normal goods car with loopholes cut in the walls. -- 202.63.39.58 (talk) 11:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Santa Clara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another view

[edit]

A different picture is given at https://townhall.com/columnists/humbertofontova/2019/01/05/anniversary-of-a-fake-news-classic-by-the-new-york-times-n2538506?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=01/05/2019&bcid=473bbc1397d52a4a751cf40b010fd6ba&recip=27850010 5.34.23.23 (talk) 13:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]