Talk:Battle of Port Louis

Battle of Port Louis has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Battle of Port Louis is part of the East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 17, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed
January 28, 2018	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Military history: British / European / French

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Port Louis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 11:16, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	DAB link to John Osborn
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	A lot Harv errors in the refs ~~Standardize your form of refs, sfns or ref tags,~~ I don't know what these mean? Can you link to a page explaining the problem?--Jackyd101 (talk) 08:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply] Fix the Harv errors by removed the original date of publications in the cites.
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Thanks for the review. I'll be away for a few days, have to come back to this when I return--Jackyd101 (talk) 08:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply] Anyways, I have fixed the last two issues for you. BTW, this is passing. Good luck on improving this article further.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 17:49, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]