Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Orbetello/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 19:57, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Infobox

[edit]
  • No issues

Lead

[edit]
  • The Battle of Orbetello (also known as the Battle of Isola del Giglio)[3] was a major naval engagement of the Franco-Spanish War of 1635, End the first sentence here to comply with WP:BEGINNING
  • ...when another Spanish army led by Marquis of Torrecuso and Duke of Arcos which had come from the Kingdom of Naples across the Papal States, Add comma between "Arcos" and "which"

Background

[edit]
  • For this purpose was gathered in Toulon a fleet... Fix prose of this phrase

Battle

[edit]
  • Fix the sentences where the sentences start with numbers that are not spelled out

Aftermath

[edit]
  • Fix the prose of the image description in this section to make it more understandable

Notes

[edit]
  • No issues

References

[edit]
  • No issues


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not concern good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 20:16, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:20, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]